Normal Game Thread Elsword Mafia Game Thread

This has nothing to do with what I said. I've already clarified what the point was, and that seems to have failed, so how about explaining why your vote ended there as opposed to anywhere else that you could have reasonably placed it?

You've totally failed to actually explain how I'm buddying in anyway. If you can't substantiate your statements, then you can't explain why you think them, which means that you are either blindly attributing claims to what I've said, regardless of how they fit, or you are intentionally trying to discredit my position without being able to back it up.

You'll note that I characterised them both as "neutral", that is to say, not indicative of either alignment.

Why Stink, specifically? You've failed to actually argue this point.

This was also neutral.

You started the game active and seeking to engage everyone. Once you returned, you didn't do this, and merely reacted to what was said. That shows you missing your behavioural baseline, which, typically, is more indicative of scum.

I've already explained exactly where you acted disingenuously.

I was referring to your actions towards myself with 7, actually, wherein you dismissed what I said as buddying and scummy while failing to substantiate either. On that note:

This is more of the same. You haven't demonstrated how I'm buddying. You haven't demonstrated how I'm even protecting him, let alone going to "great lengths" to do so.

See, while this might explain the point, it doesn't really debunk it. Either concede the point or come up with a valid counter.

What even? Do you not know what qualified means? It means that you've substantiated your claims - you've not demonstrated how my post fits into your characterization of it. It has nothing to do, specifically, with the accusation, and everything to do with the supporting evidence for it (of which there is none).

I mean, gifs and "witty" one-liners are all very fun, but they don't an argument make, sadly.

 

awwww have to catch up again to post what? nothing.

I already explained my touch on shock it was a simple nick picking in the first 10 posts into the game. Can't believe I am elaborating this to people for the hundreth time already am I in a academy game?

How am I dodging? I replied to every single post of his. He emphasize on my opening post and I replied and explained it. I am tired of repeating myself please read.

Wait you pushed me? what? we on the same game here? acting like all your efforts and push on me will go to vain LMFAO!! girl you got submitted by prada nagging and changed your vote on me.

I don't want prada to be lynched this DP, I want to lynch him or ratchet next DP If somehow i survived this DP and the NP. Voting him back is OMGUS won't help my situation one bit.

Lynch me and you lose an important townie that's all I am gonna say. I feel like I explained more than enough and to be honest it is tiring to keep repeating myself and end up writing a wallies over and over again.

this might be little underwhelming but getting tired of writing wallies.

 

It's not OMGUS if you substantiate it with any reason other than "because he voted me".

 

I already pointed out where you dodged &.&

What? Either i made a typo but im pretty sure i didnt. What i mean to say is if i get you lynched this dp i can use everything you've said and others said as evidence to push a lynch against him, and right now the only way to do that is through your death.

What im saying is technically im using him, Prada and Ratchet to some extent.

So i asked you to provide an alternative to me, so youre saying if i drop your vote, and you survive, you'll vote for him, maybe.

But the problem with that is i dont know you're town either. If i drop my vote im not voting for someone else this dp im abstaining. And that's not to say i wont decide he's town anyway.

But right now that's where my head is at


But then we'll also go with a no lynch and im not sure how i feel about that this dp

Musings.

 

how you are buddying him? go back and see your posts lol. Seamlessly agreeing to his reasons even tho i replied to them and continue on deep throating literally everything he says. Even tho he admittedly said that he "idk what i meant" I actually find it quiet amusing you out of all people would follow a person with such attitude. That is called buddying my dear ratchet.


You'll note that I characterised them both as "neutral", that is to say, not indicative of either alignment.

........

​

you must be blind. Yes I am now sure you are blind to this game.

I was out most of the day and when I came back around 3am i only had time to reply to people posts and call it a day.

The answer to this confusion you are having ratchet is called "Life".

seems being straightforward and replying is being disingenuously.

Rest of the post was just you repeating yourself. From that shock statement you also need to to reread the thread again.

 

Even i think youre buddying or at least the 'leech' effect i mention, you two seem currently quite supporting and in agreement with each other, your posts on SK seem coordinated.

And he did point out why he voted and kept a vote on stink

 

If i take my vote off sk into a abstain will he still be in majority?

 

My alternative is to vote for Nick01 and wait it out till the next DP2 where we will have more information from the NP actions and if I actually survive then we go after prada and ratchet.
I don't know about you but for this DP my vote is sticking on nick01 after that terrible post that contradicted his existence.

 

right now it's 5 votes on me and 3 votes on you. If you abstain it becomes 4 votes on me. If you vote for nick then it becomes 4v4 making it a tie.

 

Edit*
sorry I meant nick01 not you.

 

And you're fine to think that, but you have to substantiate it. "I think this might mean this" just simply isn't an argument.

Not satisfactorily, in my opinion. It didn't address the actual core of the point, which was "why not literally anyone else" (through following his logic).

 

Musings youre an interesting player, i like you.
If i vote for nick01 to me that looks way too jumpy even for my playstyle, while his post made little sense he's low on my priority list right now
And should prada or ratchet come back as town ill use my case and push a lynch on you, one of you will come back as mafia im sure but if i can have a vote to Kickstart my push on them it isnt necessary to vote you off so quickly.

Aaahhh i see, ignore what i said then about voting for nick, im getting a little sleepy and for whatever reason i thought abstaining would tie it.

Change vote: @SK
New @Nick01
@Lord Maple

Reason everything that has just occurred
Maybe you do just want to use me for a vote, but thats what I want to do to you so ill bite.

 

this.... this is dead on proof that you either not paying attention to the game or you straight up don't care.

I already said it multiple times I voted stink because his first post was 100% fluff and got this carefree attitude off him. So I pressured voted him to get something out of him.

 

Thats truth and i can grab some posts where you two are agreeing with each other it's just a little trickier on phone and i cant really be bothered to grab my laptop again.

Maybe it wasnt but it did match in to what he said about panda as well. Although i do somewhat agree

 

But there was loads of fluff at the start. Why him over anyone else who posted fluff?