Normal Game Thread YOISS6V2

I mean, if you want - I can correct my statement and say that I share suspicion of both you and Crimson. Buuuuuttt leaning more towards you with the kind of responses you are putting out if I'm gonna be honest.

 

You'd be correct.

That's a rather.. narrow perspective compared to the Ratchet I've seen in other games.

 

There is a difference reading between the lines and assuming way too much.

Metagaming.

Vote: Crimson Falcon

 

I mean, he basically confirmed it lmao. I don't think you can claim that sort of thing after it's been said and done.

 

:shakes head


Welp, it sure didn't take much for you to crack.

 

@Globear - How much time do we have left?

 

You're retroactively applying information we know afterwards. At the time it was not clear at al, and I don't buy that you just happened to conjecture correctly. I think both you and Crimson are scum.

Crack? You're metagaming. That's scum logic. It's scum logic because it allows you to make observations (that are untrue) about my play based on meta without ever qualifying your claims. Did you not understand that or something? Plus, this will be a pretty good test from my perspective. I mean, if you're Town, scum have every reason to join to hammer you. So if they don't, that's going to tell me you're scum.

 

I think you're just reaching for anything that can implicate anyone but you.

 

I chuckled at this bit especially.

 

I think you're not applying critical thinking here. Try looking at how I'm perceiving it from the perspective that I'm town, and it should make sense. When Crimson says one thing, you immediately assume suspicion on me (not Crisp), and then that just happens to be correct? I'm not buying it.

Is it a great argument? No, but activity has not been great so this is what I have to work with.

 

???
Majority is reached at 3?
We know scum is 2 strong?
I have 1 vote on you?
1+2 = 3?
Like
????

BTW, if you're the indie this is your time to make that clear. I don't think you're Town, and I'm not going to waste my time pursuing indies at this point. Ball is in your court.

 

I mean, anyone who can read between the line

No, I think you're the one that isn't applying critical thinking here. If you read between the lines of what going on and what happened, you'd come to the same conclusions that myself and Crimson have already without even talking to each other about it. I'm fairly confident I know what his role is, as I am fairly confident he know what my role is. But, then again - you're so intent on trying to push the focus onto someone else, you're completely overlooking that information entirely.

 

Ignore the first line, I started writing a post beforehand and forgot to delete it. o/

 

I'm still gonna wait for Crispickle to comment before placing my vote - though I don't think much will persuade me off from voting her at the end of the day.

 

Stop with your "reading between the lines" buzzword and substantiate your argument. Quote what is relevant and make your case, or better yet, tell me how you came to the conclusion you came to step by step. All I'm asking for is the process here, and you are being intentionally obtuse about it.