Normal Game Thread Big Trouble in Little Salem

Globear Prolly Town in this one.

 

yea that guy with luffy avy [ game threw last game too]

 

Town Read on Wowee.

I like that they bolded the "I investigate innocent". I also like that they are bringing in new points to analyse in their first post.

 

Nigen/Prada here looks to be TvT.

 

jesus christ. I am seriously considering a policy lynch on him then

 

What? The "Durr I'll go PM you" retort?

 

Oh trust me I want it too along with Strike 1 for this shit

 

Can you better explain what, in that quoted post, made you think that? I feel like you're throwing reads around just to throw reads around

How does bolding that make someone more likely town when it's so easy to do lol.. Still making me uncomfortable with how quick you are to jump to reads, but I guess it could just be your thing at this point

What did he do? mm

 

Is he here? No. Last game he wasn't either and pulled loads of bullshit.

 

previous game - inactive then game threw
this game v1 - 1 post in whole dp 1
this game v2 - no post so far


And he is prolly saying it cuz glob inatifagged to hell in v1 of this game as scum

 

Try reading the post Viole. Then address it, instead of "you're just putting words in my mouth".

Not my problem if you can't convey yourself properly. If you split your post up into sentences, then it's appropriate I believe to assume those sentences address the other post in chronological order. When the fourth sentence refers to the section immediately after the bit I was referring to, then the third point should reference the bit after the first and second but before the forth. As you clearly struggle with this, let me break it down.

Your response - "Scum tell is scum tell regardless of experience. Just because a new ones make scum arguments you wont take it off cuz lol newbie"

Your response - "You are the one escalating the shit by constant bringing it up and Jabs like lol she will teach me mafia now."

"Dont be a shit and shit wont start."

"Im not putting on pedastal. I noted it, Moved on. IF everyone else brings it up again and further try to twist it IT will be brought out."

So the "Dont be a shit and shit wont start." clearly cant be referring to the first bit, and it can't be referring to the fourth bit, which means it must refer to the second bit. The second bit was regarding Prada's comment claiming you made a mountain out of a molehill regarding Crimson's WIFOM arguments. Your response to that only makes sense if the "as shit" part is referring to Crimson, as him not being a shit presumably would mean that he wouldn't be making any WIFOM arguments and he wouldn't refuse to defend himself, and thus nothing would have started.

So you can accuse me of twisting your words, but this seems pretty straightforward to me. If you can;t convey ourself properly, then either try a more direct method (numbering, or breaking up the quotes), or find a way to convey your meaning better, rather than accuse someone else (me) of twisting anything when this is demonstrably on you.

This is in no way reflected in your post. Nothing in what you were responding to had anything to do with any jab, in fact, you have to go a few posts back to find the last mention of any jab, which was here. In fact, I'll just go back through it all again.

Here was the "Little Viole got pissy". Post 73.
Here is your jab back. Post 75.
Here is Prada's response. He ignored the jab, and bolds one line, which his post pertains to. Post 79.
Here is your response to that. Nothing about this has any mention of any of the aforementioned jabs. Post 81.
Here is Prada's response to Post 81. Post 82.
Here is your response, and this contains the quotes mentioned above. Post 85.

So we can see that there has been two full back and forths without any jabs that you claim your comment was in reference to, and a full back and forth without any reference at all to any of them (Post 81-82, no quotes contained anything about the jabs). So your explanation is that you decided to randomly bring up the jabs again despite them having been taken out of the conversation for a significant portion of the full back and forth between you two, and that further I was just supposed to know that this is what you were doing, despite you responding to a quote that had nothing to do with either jab, I should have known full well your comment was regarding the jabs and had nothing to do with what you were responding to. It was a third sentence entirely out of the blue, but I'm twisting your words because I couldn't read your mind.

Nope. That's not going to fly.

Just had to point this out for how hilariously stupid it is to have gone through the apparent process Viole has claimed to go through, and still demand people just know your intentions despite how random and all over the place they are.

 

Talking to prada about shit
Aimed at prada

You think its not

and thats my fault

Sure whatever floats your boat.

 

What part of that psot gives you a tow read?

How does bolding something make someone more likely town? I can understand the second bit, but the first bit seems, to be frank, utterly ridiculous.

 

Try reading again. I made it pretty easy for you. All you have to do is read downwards like normal, and click the links. Shouldn't be too hard.

 

I know what I meant

No need to tell me what I meant

Thank you very much

Even if I wasnt clear enough in first - I made it in clear in 2nd post .

So you can keep on dragging and Ill keep on ignoring it from now on.