Normal Game Thread Full Metal Panic!: Fighting Boy Meets Girl Mafia

Firstly that's personal opinion

And not why i did it anyway really - i said that

Considering i also said that was an ability reason i claimed which everyone also conventionally ignored.

Technically i mean that's what cop does. Well not me specifically but a cop exists to clear and find guilty players.

If that was really my ability and then cop died in the np wording of like yours suggesting that'd be so obvious though &.&

 

@Rotaretilbo
You mention it's purely flavor, but I am thinking from a balance perspective here. Like it's not something that makes any real sense to me since Ratchet wouldn't know , if any female players would even sign up before the game. I think there is more to it than it meets the eye.

I am also fine with lynching a lurker here, but mostly because I am in 4 games right now. Ideally if a cop is around, they should have selfchecked dayphase 1 and should investigate one of the lurkers here or one of the more quiet towns. (yes that would include me here as well)

I kinda dislike that CF threw shade on a few people right away. Saying that I would kill Ningen because of an argument etc. What do you make out of that?

 

I disagree i dont think we should lynch a lurker necessarily not this day phase. We should work with what we have.
Like give them a chance you know

 

It's called POE and it needs to be cleared. Ideally you don't want lurkers around forever.

 

Thats not what im saying though.
I said "not this day phase" not everybday phase

 

This dayphase seems pretty suited for it

 

Musings why this dayphase in favour of any others exactly?
Which of the lurkers do you propose to be lynched

 

Because we still are early into the game. It's better than day 2 or day 3 (which is usually lylo in a ratchet game).

It also clears the PoE earlier, so that's a good thing. You don't want a lylo with 2 lurkers around and I can assure you, if they aren't scum they will be there as easy scapegoats.

 

Musings fair enough but which one of them do you suggest then?

 

For some reason I haven't got notifications from like page 8. I didn't even get Rot's tag

Hmmm. I think we have a couple options here. Globear is the most outwardly suspicious imo. The claim, the interaction, and seemingly trying to bait the cop is all really bad play, especially under the logic of playing for self. Of your godfather you could also scan innocent and waste a scan while also gaining some town cred. She also may be soft defending one of the inactives.

Rail's claim is pretty crazy and while I could see it with the flavor, it just seems very weird to put in a game like this. Like what happens if he misses a post? Not to mention it was also one of the unprompted claims.

Pradaalso came out with an unprompted claim as well, gotta re read some of their post again as i remember something else I found sus but I'm mobile and can't really go back or this ehole post goes bye bye. The act they haven't claimed what they scan so far is also weird and worrisome (unless I missed that).

Shanks is scaring me just because she seems a bit more aloof right now than I've seen from her. Nothing to read scum atm but enough to keep my open.

Then we get to evil. At first I def saw merit in the arguments but considered ot could be him playing off something he could turn into a wagon. His backing down now from that train of thought kinda worries me but woth the claim it could just be that.

Still think crimson is scum so nothing has changed there.

Pou pou I have a complete neutral read in atm. Will glance over their post again.

One of these claims is fake. So best course of action is to see the interaction between them and lynch one of the ones who's been vouched for or soft defended by another, or go with an inactive given glo's soft defense and it being day 1 with so many damn claims.

 

I can definitely say im fine with an active being lynched but "cause inactive cause don't wanna decide" is aggravating. If they can chose one and point out why they should be lynched then im happy to vote for that person

Dont think evil is going to respond to me anyway so i can return to that next dp. If im still alive there's that to.

I just dont understand how in this case what rail is suggesting works like what's the rules to this. Can they lynch me? Can they see my night actions? Does this mean they cant convince someone to vote against me?
I doubt a role like that would have any not clears about it

Im just glad the game heated up. It was getting boring

 

That's the thing though... you can't really point out why an inactive should be lynched other than for that inherent reason of them being inactive, unless they have a pool of sample post. I found it weird that you were so against possibly lynching one of them and seemingly didn't understand why it's better to get them out of the way early.

You are also staking a lot of your game on the cop investigating you and us believing there is no chance for you to be gf. You claimed guardian right? I also find it weird that you would be guardian without the risk, instead of just a flat out doc. To me that could signal you trying not to be counterclaimed or maybe mafia already hit the doc ( i don't recall if we saw ningens role).

What are your thoughts on lord maple/crimson and why do you think we should 't lynch one of venom or daoko?

 

Oh nvm vioke was a vanilla

 

Well i mean a reason could be theyve been lurking in the thread, or mentioned by another player. I mean just like not go for someone because you cant be bothered to choose outta the suspect pool if you know what i mean
No i know why it's good to get them out of the way &.& but it's not like we're limited on suspects right now.

Ningen was vanilla im pretty sure it said.
I keep saying theres more to my ability &.& &.& &.& &.& &.&.
I get aggravated when people dont read all of peoples posts bwaaaaa +.+

Maple i dont know she posted once but keeps lurking i dont know if i like
CF as ive said i haven't been liking his posts at all and he seems dismissive on arguments

Honestly theres more agaisnt those two then venom or daoko. We have higher chance getting scum outta suss people then quiet people

 

Well it's not about "a reason" but " the reason" which you gave later in the post. The thing is at this point we have a bunch of sus people, all of which have oretty much claimed outside of maple i think. They've had plenty of time to post and don't even have one to their name, so could be pretty dangerous especially cause we also don't have info on their scanning.

I don't see the reason for you being so cyrptic about stuff now that you've out yourself out there so early in dp1. You kinda dig your own hole there and not only leaning on others to clear you but not willing to play ball all the way, there needs to be a five and take and helps is see you as more genuine.

So you're neutral on maple and slight scum lean on crimson?