Normal Game Thread YOISS6V2

I'm not so sure. It says that 'the boy protected himself even though it was not needed' which makes me lean towards an inno with a passive ability as opposed to a scum who disguised themselves.

 

Of course, it would mean that the cop protected themselves, but the cop would have to confirm that protecting themselves was one of their passives.

 

could also mean***

Yay triple post because I suck.

 

Well I'm not sure what the purpose is of asking me about one specific player, but anyways. I did say last phase tin foil suggests one of the actives at least is scum, and I also disagreed with the point Crisp made regarding the town read he gave, I think it was Cat. Pretty sure Cat is town now though.

That said, I dont have any particular scum read. That's kinda what happens when the game is so dead. Schpitt had a poor reaction to pressure so I think that lynch was justified. From today, the only things that stuck out were firstly Beat claiming they agreed with your suspicion of me, despite you actually saying nothing of the kind. I disliked you not correcting this belief even more, felt like exactly the kind of opportunistic interaction scum would have at LyLo.

 

@Beatrice You could read it as such, but there's other ways, as well.

Come on Ratchet, you know what the purpose is of asking specific questions.

Let's see for me Crisp started out fairly solid, but then spiraled worse and worse as phase reached ending (prior to server shit again).

I'd agree on Coffee, I have a very low % of error on thinking she's scum.

Unfortunate, but true

There's good reasoning with people agreeing though

There's a fair bit of info going around after last night, and with no kill mafia's been put in a bit of a pickle.
Things aren't completely hopeless for them... depending on if globby buffed any of their roles as well, butttttt... odds are stacked at this point in time without some incredibly bad luck.

So if Crispickle was the majority lynch you'd go with it without complaint?

 

You do realise that the Cop would have to claim, when claiming is forbidden in the rules, right?

 

hence why this is so hard.

 

Well I'm confused as to the purpose of that instead of just asking my thoughts on every player. It seems pointlessly limited to me. Especially when it pertains to reads, and not any general part of my play or someone else's.

Also when have I ever just gone along with a lynch? I wouldn't defend Crisp on a lynch, but I'm not about to follow anything poorly reasoned.

 

So you suggestion that they claim is bogus.

 

No, I'm pointing out that it's impossible to confirm who exactly protected themselves during the night.

 

I'm not interested in your reads on every player, to be very honest.


I mean you can give it, but I'd rather hear specifics when I want specifics. And if I want specifics there's reasons for wanting them I would think...


So to sum it up: Crispy you find sus, Beatrice you find sus for agreeing, me you find sus for not calling her out, Coffee you find town

Basically?

 

I'm going to kind of explain things a bit.
1- no claiming this game because no one here has played in my modding style before and I think just judging on the Np 1 write up that was a good choice to make it would have made things very messy.
2- From the first start (v1) I added two abilities (not passives typo) to cop that wasn't there previously. Normally I tweak my games to suit players but I've never modded for you guys before so v1 kinda told me it was a good idea to add it. That was the only real buff from v1 but anything other pertaining to night write ups I can't answer anything else was already In the original plans
3- I will also say this - I make a game fair on both parties. I can't predict the winner and it's up to the individual players to win their win con but all wincons minus skill have a fair chance.

If that helps clear anything up.

 

Interesting

 

I mean, sure, but that's twofold. There's a just as likely reason from my perspective - that you're pseudo-scumhunting. And given where we are, asking for such specifics seems largely pointless.

Beat for agreeing to something that was never said, and you not pointing this out, yeah. I mean, I'd expect any town to be wary of buddying here, and the way you just went along with it looked more like a slip to be honest. If I had to pick scum here it would be you and Beet both.

 

Really? Am I not allowed to read between the lines here?

I mean, I thought it was pretty clear by the way he structured his post that he suspects you and Crispickle and isn't bothered so much about myself and Coffee. Maybe I'm reading into something that isn't there?